Hello Dr. Philo, here: we have a great ground we have with love. As it is not closed two people go there to play their dog. The first time I informed them that this was private property, they did not. But since they come every day.
- Is it normal that it annoys me at the highest point or is it selfishness.
- Why am I so hard to tell them to leave?
- Do I feel guilty to have so much property that we have yet so easily won?
Isabelle (Note this Post )
Here's a question that might as well be addressed to the lawyer and / or psychologist.
If it is for the philosopher, then it is our relationship to private property that is queried
Because if we leave (temporarily) aside the second question, we are dealing with an issue typically Rousseau.
is indeed Rousseau wrote that private property is defined by excluding the right of others to do what they want from our well : property before a sense is a reality characterized by the exclusion of others. My property is the domain of my private life, only entered those I authorized. And not all their dogs. And especially not if it is to defile their droppings.
The question is not so much to know why it annoys you because, given what we just said property, and your invaders being duly warned that they were on the you, they do not take into account but rather how it is that you feel "guilty" of owning this property, "and why you reluctant to enforce your rights .
So we can try several answers:
- As soon as you are without thinking rather Rousseau (1), and you get the idea that the private property n is not something really legitimate I mean that mankind could live without private property there.
- En suite, as Rousseau also says (it's in the Social Contract this time), the property must be proportionate to human needs and capacities of work (he is still the land ownership and thus the field size required to support the farmer).
However, as you point out, this great land is commensurate with your work since you bought your due compensation. This work is just upstream of the possession and not after (as is the field that is legitimized by the farm work).
- Finally, that this way of excluding people is an attitude you unsavory morally . Even if you are unsure of wanting to love our neighbor as ourselves, yet we have an old fund that we recommend human hospitality for the passing stranger. It is believed that the Greeks: the beggar who is at your door may be disguised as a God who comes to the testing of hospitality.
So if your invaders - and their dog - are gods, let them.
If not, then plant a fence and buy a gun.
(1) See the text :
The first one, having enclosed a piece of land, thought of saying: This is mine, and found people simple enough to believe him was the real founder of civil society. What crimes, wars, murders, how many miseries and horrors would not have spared the human race who, pulling up the stakes or filling in the ditch, had shouted to his fellows: Beware of listening to this imposter; you are lost if you forget that the fruits belong to all, and that the land belongs to nobody. (Discourse on the Origin of Property, 2 nd part)
0 comments:
Post a Comment